BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:79362b902b175ff0af9ac17d2026b7b9
CATEGORIES:Seminars
CREATED:20150211T194936
SUMMARY:Tetsuro Senga - Ohio State University (Job Market Seminar)
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>New Look at Uncertainty Shocks: Imp
 erfect Information and Misallocation</strong></p><p style="text-align: just
 ify;">Abstract:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Uncertainty faced by ind
 ividual firms appears to be heterogeneous. In this paper, I construct new e
 mpirical measures of firm-level uncertainty using data from the I/B/E/S and
  Compustat. These new measures reveal persistent differences in the degree 
 of uncertainty facing individual firms not reflected by existing measures. 
 Consistent with existing measures, I find that the average level of uncerta
 inty across firms is countercyclical, and that it rose sharply at the start
  of the Great Recession. I next develop a heterogeneous firm model with Bay
 esian learning and uncertainty shocks to study the aggregate implications o
 f my new empirical findings. My model establishes a close link between the 
 rise in firms’ uncertainty at the start of a recession and the slow pace of
  subsequent recovery. These results are obtained in an environment that emb
 eds Jovanovic’s (1982) model of learning in a setting where each firm gradu
 ally learns about its own productivity, and each occasionally experiences a
  shock forcing it to start learning afresh. Firms differ in their informati
 on; more informed firms have lower posterior variances in beliefs. An uncer
 tainty shock is a rise in the probability that any given firm will lose its
  information. When calibrated to reproduce the level and cyclicality of my 
 leading measure of firm-level uncertainty, the model generates a prolonged 
 recession followed by anemic recovery in response to an uncertainty shock. 
 When confronted with a rise in firm-level uncertainty consistent with adven
 t of the Great Recession, it explains 79 percent of the observed decline in
  GDP and 89 percent of the fall in investment.</p>
DTSTAMP:20260406T091547Z
DTSTART:20150209T153000Z
DTEND:20150209T170000Z
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR