BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:f4fe8e031c3f96745111c6cd4a445da2
CATEGORIES:Seminars
CREATED:20211011T105128
SUMMARY:WEBINAR: Dave Donaldson - MIT
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"
 >Misallocation in Firm Production: A Nonparametric Test Using Procurement L
 otteries</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
  sans-serif;">” with Paul Carrillo (GWU), Dina Pomeranz (U Zurich) and Moni
 ca Singhal (UC Davis)</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><sp
 an style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Abstract: </s
 pan></strong></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11
 pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Is there misallocation in firm produ
 ction, as we might expect to result from market power, contracting constrai
 nts, taxes,&nbsp;regulations, corruption, or other potential distortions? A
 nd where there is misallocation, how severe are its resulting&nbsp;welfare 
 consequences? In this paper we propose a new test for allocative efficiency
  of production (AEP) that proceeds&nbsp;without restrictions on firms' prod
 uction technologies, demand, market structure, or optimizing behavior. We a
 lso&nbsp;develop a new procedure to quantify losses from misallocation via 
 a nonparametric instrumental variable random&nbsp;coefficient model. Both p
 rocedures exploit exogenous shocks that induce some firms to alter their in
 put use and then&nbsp;measure the average level of, and cross-firm dispersi
 on in, the rate at which firms’ output value increases, on the&nbsp;margin,
  for a given increase in inputs. We apply these results to a setting in whi
 ch thousands of firms experience&nbsp;exogenous demand shocks due to lotter
 y-based assignment of public procurement contracts for construction service
 s in&nbsp;Ecuador. Using administrative data on these firms, a randomizatio
 n inference version of our test rejects the null of AEP&nbsp;but the welfar
 e losses resulting from this misallocation are only 1% relative to the firs
 t-best. Standard parametric&nbsp;assumptions applied to the same setting wo
 uld suggest losses that are an order of magnitude larger.&nbsp;</span></p>
DTSTAMP:20260507T222557Z
DTSTART:20220324T163000Z
DTEND:20220324T173000Z
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR